3 Review(s)

Inspired by the syncretic aura of the opinions of Bhamah, Dandi Udbhat, Vamana, Rudrat, Rajasekhara, Ku-tak, Anandvardhan etc., dedicated to Saraswati by Bhoj, and by ignoring the rhetoric, formalism etc., in the background of soundism, from the elements that discipline poetry This book, which presents a comparative review of Kavyanusasan created by Hemchandra, is a true mirror of Indian poetry. After examining the poetic beliefs of two different Matavalamvi Acharyas on the basis of her opinion, the author has done a simple and comprehensible review without any kind of prejudice, it can be called a fundamental achievement of poetry. The comparison of Bhoja and Hemchandra's views on the nature of poetry, the purpose of poetry, the distinction between defects, virtues, rasa and ornamentation, on the one hand, clarifies the difference between the poetic concepts of both the masters, and on the other hand, the poetic concepts of different schools of poetry. Nebhi also does not miss to point out. To what extent both the Acharyas have touched the poetic schools and in the interpretation of which elements of poetry they have been investing more attention, light has also been thrown in this direction in this book. Criticism of Bhojraj's original thinking about the essence of poetry and the ideas that reflected his originality even in the shadow of Hemchandra's argument, is undoubtedly the way to solve his thoughts related to juice.