3 Review(s)

About The Book: In 1839, the esteemed Elphinstone made an observation regarding Indian history, stating that a specific public event could be determined before Alexander's invasion, while a comprehensive account of national events could only be attempted after the Muslim conquest. Professor Cowell, commenting on this statement twenty-seven years later, emphasized the importance of keeping this in mind throughout the Hindu period. He cautioned that only when other nations interacted with the Hindus could precise details be ascertained. While the first part of Elphinstone's proposition, strictly interpreted, remains valid, as no date prior to Alexander's invasion can be determined with absolute precision, modern research has significantly weakened its significance. Scholars have managed to approximate numerous dates in India's pre-Alexandrine history through extensive research, which serves most purposes adequately. Moreover, when we examine the claim that a coherent narrative of events before the Muslim conquest is impossible, we find that the progress made in recovering India's lost history over the past seventy years is remarkable. The diligent efforts of numerous scholars in various disciplines have revealed a wealth of unexpected historical materials, enabling the reconstruction of ancient Indian history. Preliminary technical studies have advanced considerably, allowing for the organization and arrangement of the accumulated and continually expanding knowledge. Consequently, it now seems feasible to present the outcomes of antiquarian studies in a comprehensive narrative format that is readily understandable to the average educated reader, much like Elphinstone's account of the events during the Muslim period. About The Author: Vincent Arthur Smith, CIE (1843-1920), was an esteemed Indologist, historian, member of the Indian Civil Service, and curator of note. He played a significant role in the field of Indian historiography during the British Raj. In the 1890s